Tag Archives: USA

LOS ANGELES COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CALLS FOR REPEAL …

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – JUNE 2, 2009
COALITION FOR LOCAL OVERSIGHT OF UTILITY TECHNOLOGIES (CLOUT) http://www.cloutnow.org

LOS ANGELES COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CALLS FOR REPEAL OF FEDERAL CELL TOWER HEALTH PREEMPTION

NEW NATIONWIDE COALITION CLAIMS FIRST MAJOR VICTORY

The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously on Tuesday, June 2, to actively seek and support federal legislation to repeal portions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 that limit the authority of state and local governments to regulate cell towers and related wireless facilities on the basis of their health and environmental effects.

The vote follows similar action taken by the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Board of Education at its May 26, 2009 meeting.

The motion by Supervisors Zen Yaroslavsky, Michael D. Antonovich and Mark Ridley-Thomas cited “ongoing debate within the scientific community and among governing bodies throughout the world regarding how thoroughly the long-term health effects of low-frequency electromagnetic and radio-frequency emissions are understood” and “questions . . . regarding how well the existing regulations established by the Federal Communications Commission [FCC] protect more vulnerable populations such as school-aged children, and how well they protect against the cumulative effect of radio-frequency emissions on people who live or work in close proximity to multiple cellular facilities.”

While the City Council of Portland, Oregon passed a resolution in May of this year calling on the FCC to work with the Food & Drug Administration and other federal health and environmental agencies to revisit and update studies on the potential health effects of wireless facilities like cell towers, Los Angeles is the first major local government to directly take on the federal preemption of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

“This marks a major step forward on this issue,” said Doug Loranger of the new nationwide organization Coalition for Local Oversight of Utility Technologies (CLOUT), which is actively seeking to change federal law governing cell towers. “For almost 15 years, local planning and zoning officials, City Council members and Supervisors across the United States have been telling residents concerned about cell tower proliferation that their hands are tied by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 when it comes to health and environmental concerns. We finally have an elected body of one of the largest metropolitan areas in the country willing to say ‘enough is enough’ and take a stand to change this situation.”

The Supervisors’ motion also calls for changes to the California Public Utilities Code (CPUC), which currently limits the authority of local governments in the State of California to regulate wireless facilities in public rights of way. These limitations have provided a convenient loophole for wireless carriers to install antennas on light and utility poles in residential neighborhoods that would otherwise be off-limits to these types of facilities.

“We literally have had people wake up to find cell towers installed directly in front of their homes with no notification or public hearings under the current CPUC regulations,” said Sally Hampton of Los Angeles, who organized the regional Southern California coalition Residents Engaged Against Cell Towers (REACT), which is part of CLOUT. “Thanks to today’s action, the word will start to get not only to our elected representatives in Washington, D.C., but also to those in Sacramento, that laws need to be changed to give local governments more authority to regulate the proliferation of wireless facilities. We applaud the leadership of the Los Angeles County Supervisors, <who collectively represent nearly 10 million citizens>, and call on all local municipalities to join forces with Los Angeles to urge the Congress to repeal those sections of the 1996 TCA which preempts local control and prevents local governments from considering health
effects. Local officials need the power to protect citizens and homeowners and to support smart deployment of better technologies that will benefit all Americans for years to come.”

As part of its efforts on this issue, the Board of Supervisors will be filing comments consistent with its motion with the FCC with regard to National Broadband Policy. Elected officials and members of the public around the U.S. have until June 8 to submit comments to the FCC on the rollout of broadband infrastructure, which forms part of President Obama’s multi-billion-dollar stimulus package.

On April 2 of this year, the European Parliament overwhelmingly passed a resolution on Health Concerns Associated with Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) by a vote of 559 to 22 (there were 8 abstentions), which includes the position that wireless telecommunications facilities should not be placed in proximity to schools, places of worship, retirement homes, and health care institutions.

Meanwhile, in the United States it remains illegal for local governments to prevent the placement of wireless facilities near schools and other sensitive locations because of the Telecommunications Act of 1996’s federal preemption.

For more information, including links to the LAUSD, City of Portland and European Parliament resolutions, visit CLOUT’s website at http://www.cloutnow.org.

Leave a comment

Filed under EMF, tower, USA, WiFi

The OTHER pollutants, Countries declare greenhouse gas reductions

Greenhouse Gas Goals For Major Nations

Date: 28-Apr-09ist1_4456495-planet-earth
Country: WORLD

April 27 – The major nations meeting for discussions on climate change in Washington on Monday and Tuesday each have different goals for curbs on greenhouse gas emissions.

China, the United States, the European Union, Russia and India are top world emitters. Targets they set will go a long way to decide the ambition of a new UN deal to fight global warming due to be agreed in Copenhagen in December.

Rich nations’ plans cluster around cuts of roughly 15 percent below current levels by 2020. Many developing nations are trying to slow the rise of emissions, without caps that they say would stifle economic growth and their drive to end poverty.

DEVELOPED NATIONS

UNITED STATES – President Barack Obama favours cutting US emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 — about 15 percent below recent levels — and by 80 percent below 1990 by 2050.

EUROPEAN UNION – European Union leaders agreed in December to cut emissions 20 percent below 1990 levels by 2020, a cut of about 14 percent from recent levels. EU leaders want rich countries to aim to reduce emissions by 60 to 80 percent by 2050 from 1990 levels.

— Britain has committed to a legally binding target to cut greenhouse gases by 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.

— Germany plans to cut carbon dioxide emissions by 40 percent by 2020 compared to 1990 levels.

RUSSIA – Has not yet set a 2020 goal.

JAPAN – Plans to outline 2020 cuts by June. The opposition Democratic Party has promised to cut emissions by 25 percent below 1990 levels by 2020 if it wins an election due by October.

CANADA – Aims to cut emissions by 20 percent below 2006 levels by 2020 and envisages cuts of 60 to 70 percent below 2006 by 2050. Emissions are now more than 20 percent above 1990 levels.

AUSTRALIA – Aims to cut emissions by 5 percent below 2000 levels by 2020 and by 15 percent below 2000 if there is a strong UN pact.

DEVELOPING NATIONS

CHINA – A 2006-10 plan aims to reduce energy consumption per unit of gross domestic product by 20 percent, curbing the rise of greenhouse gas emissions.

Beijing also plans to quadruple gross domestic product between 2001 and 2020 while only doubling energy use.

INDIA – New Delhi says priority must go to economic growth to end poverty while shifting to clean energies, led by solar power. A climate plan last June set no greenhouse caps but said per capita emissions will never exceed those of rich nations.

BRAZIL – Plans measures including halving Amazon deforestation over 10 years to avert 4.8 billion tonnes of emissions of carbon dioxide, energy conservation and sustaining the share of renewable energies. Hydropower alone accounts for 77 percent of electricity generation.

INTERNATIONAL TARGETS

THE KYOTO PROTOCOL – Binds industrialized nations except the United States to cut emissions on average by at least 5 percent below 1990 levels by 2008-12.

GROUP OF EIGHT – Leading industrial nations agreed at a G8 summit in Japan in July 2008 to a “vision” of cutting world emissions of greenhouse gases by 50 percent by 2050.

GLOBAL – About 190 nations agreed last year to work out a new treaty by the end of 2009 to succeed Kyoto, comprising deeper emissions cuts by rich nations and action by poor countries to slow their rising emissions.

(Compiled by Alister Doyle, Nina Chestney, Gerard Wynn and Risa Maeda; Editing by Ralph Boulton)

Reuters

Leave a comment

Filed under awareness, environment, global warming, greenhouse emissions, pollution

Hypersensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields in California

Study of Self-Reported Hypersensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields in California

Patrick Levallois,1,2 Raymond Neutra,3 Geraldine Lee,3 and Lilia Hristova3

1Unité de Recherche en Santé Publique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Beauport, Québec, Canada; 2Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Québec, Canada; 3EMF Program, California Department of Health Services, Oakland, California, USA

Abstract

Cases of alleged hypersensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) have been reported for more than 20 years, and some authors have suggested some connection with the “multiple chemical sensitivity” illness. We report the results of a telephone survey among a sample of 2,072 Californians. Being “allergic or very sensitive” to being near electrical devices was reported by 68 subjects, resulting in an adjusted prevalence of 3.2% (95% confidence interval = 2.8, 3.7) .

Twenty-seven subjects (1.3%) reported sensitivity to electrical devices but no sensitivity to chemicals. Characteristics of the people reporting hypersensitivity to EMFs were generally different from those of people reporting being allergic to everyday chemicals. Alleging environmental illness or multiple chemical sensitivity diagnosed by a doctor was the strongest predictor of reporting being hypersensitive to EMFs in this population.

Other predictive factors apart from self-reporting chemical sensitivity were race/ethnicity other than White, Black, or Hispanic ; having low income ; and being unable to work. The perception of risk of exposure to EMFs through the use of hair dryers (vs. exposure to power and distribution lines) was the factor the most associated with self-reporting about hypersensitivity to EMFs.

However, risk perception was not sufficient to explain the characteristics of people reporting this disorder. Key words: , . Environ Health Perspect 110(suppl 4) :619-623 (2002) .

http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2002/suppl-4/619-623levallois/abstract.html

The full version of this article is available for free in HTML or PDF formats.

Leave a comment

Filed under environment, public safety

North America’s EMF Agencies

Canada

Canadian Electricity Association (CEA)

Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA)

Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association (CWTA)

RF.com: Wireless Communications and Health (formerly, the Wireless Information Research Centre)

Rule of Law Defenders: Dedicated to Exposing Electromagnetic Torture in Canada

Stop Cell Towers

WEEP: Canadian Initiative To Stop Wireless, Electric and Electromagnetic Pollution

U.S.A.

Federal Agencies

DOE Office of Environment, Safety and Health

EPA Office of Air & Radiation

FCC Office of Engineering and Technology

FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau

FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH)

FDA Cell Phone Facts (Joint FCC-FDA consumer information Web site)

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) (see also “NIEHS EMF RAPID Program” below)

National Toxicology Program (NTP)

National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA)

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)State and Local Agencies

California EMF Program

Massachusetts Dept. of Public Health Radiation Control Program

Minnesota Dept. of Health (page on cell phones)

New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection

Radiation Protection Program (page on non-ionizing radiation)

 

State and Local Agencies

California EMF Program

Massachusetts Dept. of Public Health Radiation Control Program

Minnesota Dept. of Health (page on cell phones)

New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection

Radiation Protection Program (page on non-ionizing radiation)

 

Quasi-Governmental Groups

National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council (NAS-NRC)

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP)

 

Non-Governmental Groups

Canyon Area Residents for the Environment (on Lookout Mountain, Colorado, antenna farm)

Cellular Tower Coalition

Communications Workers of America

Electrical Pollution (Dirty Power)

EMR Network

EMR Policy Institute

Institute for Inquiry

Midwest Rural Energy Council

Power Line Task Force

SNAFU (San Francisco Neighborhood Antenna-Free Union)

 

Leave a comment

Filed under EMF, public safety